Connect with others who understand.

Sign up Log in
Resources
About MyHeartDiseaseTeam
Powered By
Real members of MyHeartDiseaseTeam have posted questions and answers that support our community guidelines, and should not be taken as medical advice. Looking for the latest medically reviewed content by doctors and experts? Visit our resource section.

For Those Who Have Had Both Cardiovesion And Ablation, Which Is Less Invasive Procedure. Trying To Make A Decision.

A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member asked a question 💭
San Diego, CA

I have continues afib, and these are two procedures for afib treatments but I'm trying to avoid any procedure if there's any other alternative.

June 4 (edited)
View reactions
A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member

Cardioversion

June 4
A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member

I had a ablation the first time out and it took am still afib free for 4 years

July 13
A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member

Cardioversion might work for you……if not……Alalation would deffidently be my second choice…..hands down without a second thought 😀

June 5
A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member

My abalation lasted approx 4 years……no other abalation offered 😏

June 27
A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member

Cleveland put me on metoprolol and spirolactone and within a week I was off both

June 20

Related content

View All

Has Anyone Got Good Results With Cardio Version For Afib?

A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member asked a question 💭
San Diego, CA

Thanks To Everyone Who Who Shared Their Experiences With Cardio Version.

A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member asked a question 💭
San Diego, CA

Has Anyone 76 Or Younger Had A Cardioversion For Afib

A MyHeartDiseaseTeam Member asked a question 💭
Midlothian, VA
Continue with Facebook
Continue with Google
By joining, you accept our Terms of Use, and acknowledge our collection, sharing, and use of your data in accordance with our Health Data Policy and Privacy policies.Your privacy is our priority Lock Icon
Already a Member? Log in